![]() IMO hidden and camouflaged AT-guns can be spotted too easily: getting enemy units close enough is the main factor. The worse the visibility, the worse the capability to spot the unit itself, the more important the muzzle flash becomes and stands out (woods, cover, night, haze, distance).Īre there discussions or plans to improve spotting in this regard? Honestly I do not like the gamey necessessity to have infantry "sensors" as far as possible ahead of tanks - instead tanks being able to spot muzzle flashes even from far distances very well on their own very much anymore. ![]() Because the spotting distance to the gun does matter much more and the muzzle-flash effect does have no effect, while in reality can be seen from very far away. This leads to the IMO quite gamey but hugely successful procedure, to scout ahead with infantry for tanks. The best way to spot a gun is to have eyes as close as possible on it. Maybe the unit can't even be seen, but the flash!Ĭurrently the muzzle flash seems to be ignored. The further the distance and worse the vision, the more important the muzzle flash seems to stand out to spot a threat nevertheless. Two scenes from the video that portray exceptionally well the importance of muzzle flashes: 5:00 and 7:50: Wittmann's Demise movie Since I saw the movie about the "Wittmann's Demise"-scenario the shown battle scenes have been staying on my mind because they gave me for the first time ever an incredible insight how important the muzzle flash must have been to spot a gun. Sadly this situation is probably the most important one: when guns open fire. I think the spotting system works surprisingly well, except in one situation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |